Page Summary
celticdragonfly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
adamselzer.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fionnabhar.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fleetfootmike.livejournal.com - (no subject)
patoadam - (no subject)
carrielee.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mdlbear - (no subject)
peteralway.livejournal.com - (no subject)
clauclauclaudia - (no subject)
filkerdave.livejournal.com - (no subject)
redaxe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
janewilliams20.livejournal.com - (no subject)
keristor.livejournal.com - (no subject)
duality.livejournal.com - (no subject)
roaming.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pocketnaomi.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lordofthewheel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
occams_pyramid - (no subject)
pbristow.livejournal.com - (no subject)
redaxe.livejournal.com - (no subject)
catmcroy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Shadows for Stepping Stones by
- Resources: Industry
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:06 am (UTC)Teddy
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:37 pm (UTC)"Anyhoo," however, bugs the crap out of me.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:41 pm (UTC)It bugs me because people say it to sound fancier, when in fact they sound pretentious and ignorant.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:45 pm (UTC)Also:
"Yesterday, Sue came down to visit with Mike and I." *cringe*
If you wouldn't with we, you shouldn't with I. ;-)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:50 pm (UTC)"The plane will be landing momentarily" [and then taking off again?]
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:50 pm (UTC)From http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/lay:
Lay has been used intransitively in the sense of "lie" since the 14th century. The practice was unremarked until around 1770; attempts to correct it have been a fixture of schoolbooks ever since. Generations of teachers and critics have succeeded in taming most literary and learned writing, but intransitive lay persists in familiar speech and is a bit more common in general prose than one might suspect. Much of the problem lies in the confusing similarity of the principal parts of the two words. Another influence may be a folk belief that lie is for people and lay is for things. Some commentators are ready to abandon the distinction, suggesting that lay is on the rise socially. But if it does rise to respectability, it is sure to do so slowly: many people have invested effort in learning to keep lie and lay distinct. Remember that even though many people do use lay for lie, others will judge you unfavorably if you do.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 06:54 pm (UTC)Anyways, I cannot stand the use of "your" when someone means "you're" or vice versa. It has bugged me since I was in school and kids would sign yearbooks with "you're friend, X." It still appears in yearbooks--I've seen it recently in Large Boy's--and shows no sign of dying online either.
Except vs. accept runs a close second.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:12 am (UTC)*So* with you on that one!
Teddy
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:06 pm (UTC)But what bugs me the most is when I make a mistake in a post complaining about spelling or grammar.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:08 pm (UTC)Plurals with apostrophes, I think. Back in alt.callahans I had a fire lizard who considered misplaced apostrophes his rightful prey. ;-) "Sale on cucumber's" -- ugh!
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:17 am (UTC)That's obviously a sale on items belongiong to Cucumber....
Teddy
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:19 pm (UTC)Oh, and leetspeak, valley speak, or most dialect, used nonsarcastically.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:19 am (UTC)I use it a lot and a severe beatig witha grammar bat wouldn't lessen my love of the word.
Teddy
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:28 pm (UTC)But to answer the question: any misuse of apostrophes, effect/affect, and the use of double quotes for what I suspect is intended to be emphasis and ends up being the opposite, e.g.
Buy our "fresh" strawberries!
implying to me that said strawberries are only pretending to be fresh.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:47 pm (UTC)Oh, and people trying to use the second person singular and getting it wrong. "I love thou" (the usage "thee is..." is apparently correct in some dialects, even though it is technically wrong, just as is "I be...").
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 07:56 pm (UTC)Does the speaker mean that he or she hopes that it will not rain, or that it will not rain, but it will perform the not raining in a hopeful manner?
Ooh, I hate that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:05 pm (UTC)When pestered repeatedly one began to make an effort to use grammar in his posts. He now has and apostrophe on every word ending in an s. Grrrr.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 09:26 pm (UTC)The almost universal use of i.e. when e.g. is obviously meant.
Its/it's - I used to be able to use these automatically, but I now have to stop and think every time because I have seen them used wrongly so often.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-22 02:24 pm (UTC)(The proper reply being "there, there!")
no subject
Date: 2006-06-20 11:19 pm (UTC)She alwayz smelz funny... [G,D&RVVF]
no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-21 11:18 pm (UTC)